Deal Structuring: Why the “Best Price” Isn’t Always the “Best Deal”

I watched a client—a sharp entrepreneur in Dubai—walk away from a multi-million dollar acquisition offer.

The number on the term sheet was dazzling, the kind that makes headlines. His board was ecstatic. But after we peeled back the layers, he turned it down. The structure of the deal was a trap disguised as a triumph.

In the dynamic markets of the UAE and Saudi Arabia, where ambition meets rapid growth, we are often hypnotized by the big number. The highest bid wins, right?

Wrong.

The true art of a successful transaction lies not in the headline price, but in the intricate architecture beneath it: Deal Structuring. This is the framework that dictates not just what you get, but howwhen, and under what conditions you get it. It’s the difference between a partnership that fuels your Vision 2030 ambitions and a transaction that drains your resources and morale.

The Allure of the “Big Number” and Its Hidden Pitfalls

Why do we default to price? It’s simple, tangible, and easy to compare. In negotiations across Riyadh and Dubai, it’s the default metric of success. But a high price often comes with strings attached that can strangle your future flexibility.

Consider a common scenario: Buyer A offers you $10 million upfront, all cash. Buyer B offers $8 million, but with a structured payout.

The instinct is to go with Buyer A. But what if that $10 million comes with:

  • No recourse for hidden liabilities? You bear all the risk if a problem emerges post-closing.
  • A demanding, inflexible integration plan that disrupts your entire operation?
  • All key personnel locked in with no flexibility for change?

Suddenly, that “winning” bid feels riskier. The initial price is just the tip of the iceberg. The structure is the massive, unseen body that determines whether your ship sails smoothly or sinks.

The Key Levers of Powerful Deal Structuring

So, if price isn’t everything, what is? A well-structured deal aligns interests, mitigates risk, and maximizes long-term value. Here are the critical levers we focus on at Ghalib Consulting:

1. Payment Terms: The Time Value of Money

Cash is king, but its reign depends on timing.

  • Upfront Cash vs. Deferred Payments: A lower upfront sum with structured deferred payments can often yield a higher total value and provide crucial post-deal operational capital. It also keeps the buyer invested in a smooth transition.
  • Seller Financing: By financing part of the purchase price for the buyer, you not only facilitate the deal but also demonstrate confidence in the business’s future, often justifying a higher overall valuation.

2. Earn-Outs: Aligning Expectations with Reality

Earn-outs are powerful tools, especially in the fast-growing—but sometimes volatile—SME sector of KSA and the UAE. They bridge the valuation gap between a seller’s optimistic projections and a buyer’s more conservative view.

Example: A Jeddah-based tech startup believes it will grow 50% next year. A large corporate buyer projects 20%. Instead of deadlocking, they structure a deal: a solid base price + an additional payout if the company hits the 50% target.

This protects the buyer from overpaying for potential that isn’t realized and rewards the seller for achieving ambitious growth.

3. Non-Monetary Terms: The Fine Print That Matters

This is where the real protection lies. The “best price” can be obliterated by poor non-monetary terms.

  • Representations & Warranties: These are your promises about the state of your business. A buyer offering a high price may demand extremely broad indemnification, exposing you to massive future liabilities for minor, unintentional oversights.
  • Employment & Non-Compete Agreements: Are you required to stay on for three years? What are the terms? An onerous employment agreement can turn a payday into a prison sentence. A poorly defined non-compete can prevent you from ever working in your industry again.
  • Governance and Control: In joint ventures, common in Vision 2030 projects, the structure of decision-making rights, board seats, and veto powers is far more important than the percentage of ownership.

A Tale of Two Deals: A Real-World Scenario

Let’s compare two offers for a family-owned manufacturing business in Dammam:

Deal A: The “High Price” Offer

  • Purchase Price: $15 Million (all cash at closing)
  • Structure: Buyer assumes all liabilities. Sellers must provide a 2-year consultancy with no performance bonuses. Broad representations and warranties with a long survival period.

Deal B: The “Structured” Offer

  • Purchase Price: $12 Million base + up to $4 Million in earn-outs based on 2-year EBITDA targets.
  • Structure: 70% cash at closing, 30% seller note paid over 3 years. Specific, reasonable reps and warranties. Sellers receive a bonus for a smooth handover.

Which is the Better Deal?

While Deal A has a higher headline number, it carries more risk and less upside. Deal B provides immediate liquidity, incentivizes a successful transition, and offers a clear path to a total value of $16 million—more than Deal A—if performance targets are hit. It creates a partnership, not just a sale.

Structuring for the UAE & KSA Landscape

Understanding local context is paramount. Here, business is built on relationships (wasta), and regulatory frameworks are evolving rapidly.

  • Adapting to Local Law: A well-structured deal in the region must account for the nuances of UAE Commercial Companies Law and Saudi Arabia’s evolving regulatory environment, especially for foreign ownership.
  • Relationship-Centric Clauses: Terms should be designed to preserve business relationships post-transaction, a critical factor in the close-knit business communities of the Gulf.
  • Tax Considerations: With the introduction of Corporate Tax in the UAE and KSA, the structure of a deal (asset vs. share sale) has significant tax implications that can drastically alter its net value.

Beyond the Signature: The Lasting Impact of Structure

A poorly structured deal is like a bad foundation for a building in the Dubai Marina; problems may not be visible at first, but they will inevitably emerge, and the cost of repair will be astronomical. It can lead to:

  • Post-deal disputes and litigation.
  • Erosion of the business’s value you just sold.
  • Damaged personal reputations and burned bridges.

A well-structured deal, however, ensures a smooth transition, maintains goodwill, and sets up both the business and its former owners for future success.

Conclusion: Structure Your Success

Chasing the highest bid is a short-term game. Building the best deal is a long-term strategy. In the ambitious economic landscapes of the UAE and Saudi Arabia, where the stakes are high and growth is relentless, the sophistication of your deal structuring is what separates transactional successes from transformational ones.

Don’t just sell your business; architect its future. Don’t just make a deal; build a legacy.


Ready to Structure a Deal That Truly Wins?

At Ghalib Consulting, we move beyond the numbers to architect M&A and investment deals that protect your interests, maximize your value, and align with your long-term vision. Our expertise in the financial and regulatory landscapes of the UAE and Saudi Arabia ensures your success isn’t just announced in a headline—it’s built into the foundation.

Contact us today for a confidential consultation on your next strategic move.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *